|
|||
|
|
|||
![]() |
by David Stanowski 19 February 2008 This article originally appeared in the Galveston County Daily News on 19 February 2008. The text version of the article appears below. ![]() There are three groups who have a stake in how special events are staged in downtown Many residents have a definite opinion on how events should be managed based solely on their personal preferences, because they have no money at risk in the outcome. The City has its own set of criteria such as security, minimizing their expenses, and maximizing earnings for City employees. ![]() Even though the City owns the streets and sidewalks, it is the businesses that line them that make downtown It was easy for a resident to go downtown during the recent Mardi Gras, and draw the conclusion that it was a “big success”, because they see thousands of people in the streets having fun catching beads. But in what sense are large crowds catching beads an accurate measure of success? Likewise, the City government can point to a lower number of arrests, and/or below-budgeted costs as evidence that the event was a success, but what about the merchants? ![]() Since many business owners see sales drop, during special events, it is difficult to see how these merchants would rate them as a success. But does anybody care about the impact of special events on downtown businesses? Apparently not, but everyone should care for two reasons. First, it is just bad manners not to. How would the residents of Galveston like it if someone commandeered the street, where they live, to stage special events, and set the terms and conditions without their consent and approval? In addition, the effect of an event in a residential area would primarily be the inconvenience to everyone’s personal activities; not the loss of income. Secondly, the way events
have been staged is potentially unlawful! There is a "minor
technicality" in the 5th Amendment called the “Takings
Clause”. It says
that if the government “takes away” someone's
property, for the good of the
community, the government must compensate them for their loss. In this
case,
the government temporarily "takes" the use of downtown property, so
they should be reimbursing business owners for any lost revenue. Sooner or later, downtown
businesses are going to start demanding "just
compensation" for their losses. This will have a negative
impact on the
City treasury, which is why it is time to consider a better
alternative. Also see Who Really Owns The Strand? For more information on the Galveston Economy: CLICK HERE Search Our Site or Search the Internet |
||